Blinders, Standard Rep. Issue for the War on Oil Bearing Countries...
Don't take off you blinders now good little boys and girls... you might get a little shocked by a dose of reality...
A) Larry did a great job... he got the candidates emotional, involved and overall charged about their responses (as well as the American Public as evidenced by your's and other's reaction). The last thing we need more of is candy coated mundane debates... It's bad enough they can't engage each other among the multitude of other debate taming guidelines.
If what you are saying is that you'd prefer more tame questions, then maybe we should redefine the meaning of "debate".
B) I'm wondering if the folks that buy into Bush's tag phrase of "flip-flop" understand the reality and deny it to fit their own twist on the truth or... if they have blinders on (in a faithful recreation of the example set by our fearless leader) and have no clue that Bush's manta is so far from the truth. Voting to trust someone (the Pres. non the less) to be able to appropriately handle the highest level of authority in no way contridicts being pissed off that they abused and grossly mishandled that authority. Point. Blank.
If you have the capacity and intelligence required to understand the difference between granting the authority vs. approving Bush's misuse of that authority then you can begin to understand the reality of the situation.
Maybe this analogy will help clear things up. For example if your mama says you can go to the store for milk if we need it and you decide to go just for the hell of it, then you might get chewed out by the very same person that said it was okay "only" if necessary.
Did that stick? Yea.. I didn't think so. Your kind doesn't care about the truth just the tag phrases you can generate from you spin based on a play of words...
Have fun with your response to this if you have the courage to even acknowledge the gravity of what I'm saying here... lol
A) Larry did a great job... he got the candidates emotional, involved and overall charged about their responses (as well as the American Public as evidenced by your's and other's reaction). The last thing we need more of is candy coated mundane debates... It's bad enough they can't engage each other among the multitude of other debate taming guidelines.
If what you are saying is that you'd prefer more tame questions, then maybe we should redefine the meaning of "debate".
B) I'm wondering if the folks that buy into Bush's tag phrase of "flip-flop" understand the reality and deny it to fit their own twist on the truth or... if they have blinders on (in a faithful recreation of the example set by our fearless leader) and have no clue that Bush's manta is so far from the truth. Voting to trust someone (the Pres. non the less) to be able to appropriately handle the highest level of authority in no way contridicts being pissed off that they abused and grossly mishandled that authority. Point. Blank.
If you have the capacity and intelligence required to understand the difference between granting the authority vs. approving Bush's misuse of that authority then you can begin to understand the reality of the situation.
Maybe this analogy will help clear things up. For example if your mama says you can go to the store for milk if we need it and you decide to go just for the hell of it, then you might get chewed out by the very same person that said it was okay "only" if necessary.
Did that stick? Yea.. I didn't think so. Your kind doesn't care about the truth just the tag phrases you can generate from you spin based on a play of words...
Have fun with your response to this if you have the courage to even acknowledge the gravity of what I'm saying here... lol
posted by Tony Walton at 9:25 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home